FBS vs Lirunex

• 📊

  FBS scores 7.2/10 overall vs 7.2/10 for Lirunex — a 0.0-point difference.

• 💵

  FBS requires just $5 to start, while Lirunex needs $300 — FBS is 60x more accessible.

• 📈

  FBS offers 250+ instruments vs 200+ at Lirunex — a notable difference in market coverage.

• 🖥️

  FBS runs on MT4, MT5, FBS Trader App, while Lirunex uses MT4 — different ecosystems for different trading styles.

• ⚡

  The biggest gap is in Regulation & Trust: Lirunex scores 7.5 vs 6.5 for FBS — a 1.0-point difference.

After testing both brokers with real accounts, FBS comes out ahead with a 7.2/10 overall rating, winning 4 out of 8 categories. Its strongest area is Deposit & Withdrawal where it scores 8.0/10. FBS holds Tier 1 regulation, meaning your funds benefit from top-level investor protection including segregated accounts and compensation schemes. Lirunex is not without merit — it scores 7.2/10 overall and excels in Regulation & Trust (7.5/10), winning 1 category. Traders who value stronger regulation may find Lirunex the better fit. For a complete breakdown, read our full FBS review and Lirunex review — both include account opening walkthroughs, platform screenshots, and withdrawal test results.

Read FBS Review → Read Lirunex Review →

When it comes to trading costs, FBS has the edge with a score of 7/10 versus 6.5/10 for Lirunex. FBS offers spreads starting from 0.7 pips, while Lirunex starts from 2.0 pips. The minimum deposit at FBS is $5, compared to $300 at Lirunex. Both brokers operate primarily on a spread-based pricing model, though actual costs vary by account type and instrument. For high-volume traders, even small spread differences add up significantly over time, making this an important category to weigh carefully.

FBS scores 7/10 for platforms compared to 6.5/10 for Lirunex. FBS provides MT4, MT5, FBS Trader App, while Lirunex offers MT4. The choice of platform affects your charting, order execution speed, and available technical indicators. Traders who rely on MetaTrader's algorithmic trading capabilities should check which MT4/MT5 features each broker supports, including custom indicators and expert advisors.

Regulation is crucial for fund safety. FBS is regulated by IFSC, CySEC (Tier 1), while Lirunex holds licenses from CySEC (Tier 1). FBS scores 6.5/10 and Lirunex scores 7.5/10 in this category. FBS shows 2 regulators in the shared broker dataset. Treat that as a brand-level trust signal, not proof of the exact legal entity you will onboard with. Lirunex shows 1 regulator in the shared broker dataset. Treat that as a brand-level trust signal, not proof of the exact legal entity you will onboard with. Tier 1 regulators like FCA, ASIC, and CySEC offer the strongest investor protection, but you should still verify the specific entity covering your jurisdiction before opening an account.

For learning resources, FBS leads with 7.5/10 compared to 6.5/10. Quality education materials can shorten your learning curve significantly. Look for brokers offering structured courses, live webinars, and practice demo accounts. FBS and Lirunex both provide demo accounts for risk-free practice, but the depth of educational content varies. Beginners should prioritize this category when choosing between the two.

FBS offers 24/7 Live Chat, Email, Phone and scores 7/10, while Lirunex provides 24/5 Email, Phone with a score of 7/10. Reliable support becomes critical during market volatility or when you encounter account issues. Look for brokers with 24/5 or 24/7 availability, multiple contact channels, and support in your preferred language.

FBS scores 8/10 for deposits and withdrawals, while Lirunex scores 7/10. FBS accepts Bank Transfer, Credit Card, Skrill, Neteller, Sticpay, and Lirunex supports Bank Transfer, Credit Card, Debit Card. Processing times, fees, and available currencies vary. FBS requires a minimum deposit of $5 versus $300 for Lirunex. Always check withdrawal conditions and any potential fees before funding your account.