SSL Encrypted 50+ Brokers Tested Data-Driven Ratings Real Money Testing Independent Reviews
Aquilla Nummus

Aquilla Nummus

🟢 Tier 1 Regulated
5.9
/ 10
vs
Fortrade

Fortrade

🟢 Tier 1 Regulated
7.5
/ 10

Aquilla Nummus vs Fortrade

A detailed side-by-side comparison based on our hands-on testing across 8 scoring categories.

Aquilla Nummus and Fortrade are both popular choices for forex and CFD traders, but they cater to different needs and experience levels. Aquilla Nummus, founded in 2016 and headquartered in Nicosia, Cyprus, is regulated by CySEC and offers spreads starting from Variable with a minimum deposit of $10000. Fortrade, established in 2013 in London, UK, holds licenses from FCA, CySEC, ASIC, IIROC with spreads from 0.8 pips and a $100 minimum deposit. In our hands-on testing across 8 scoring categories, Fortrade scored 7.5/10 overall compared to Aquilla Nummus's 5.9/10, making it the stronger pick for most traders. That said, Aquilla Nummus holds its own with overall value, so your ideal broker depends on what you prioritize in a trading partner.

Trust stack

Trust stack for this head-to-head

This comparison uses the same review dataset, methodology, disclosure, and corrections standards as the rest of TBR money pages. Head-to-head verdicts still need an entity-level regulation check before signup.

Updated
May 3, 2026
Methodology
Methodology
Corrections / contact
Corrections / Contact

Risk layer

Risk & regulation snapshot for Aquilla Nummus

Regulation

Third-party

CySEC · brand-level entity model

Leverage / exposure

Broker-stated

1:5 (tighter leverage ceiling)

Trust read

Verified

Tier 1 trust profile

Regulation status

Third-party

CySEC gives this broker a cleaner top-tier regulation read than the average CFD brand.

Entity nuance

Third-party

Aquilla Nummus shows 1 regulator in the shared broker dataset. Treat that as a brand-level trust signal, not proof of the exact legal entity you will onboard with.

Investor protection

Unknown

Top-tier regulation helps on paper, but the canonical dataset still does not lock the exact compensation scheme or client-money safeguards for every onboarding entity.

Verification state

Verified

Verification state: brand-level regulator mapping is in place, but the exact contracting entity is still inferred rather than fully pinned in the canonical dataset.

High-risk warning

Broker-stated

The leverage ceiling is comparatively tighter, but CFDs and leveraged forex still carry real loss risk.

Risk layer

Risk & regulation snapshot for Fortrade

Regulation

Third-party

FCA, CySEC, ASIC, IIROC · brand-level entity model

Leverage / exposure

Broker-stated

1:30 (tighter leverage ceiling)

Trust read

Verified

Tier 1 trust profile

Regulation status

Third-party

FCA, CySEC, ASIC gives the brand real tier-1 coverage, but the footprint is mixed because IIROC also appears in the regulator stack.

Entity nuance

Third-party

Fortrade shows 4 regulators in the shared broker dataset. Treat that as a brand-level trust signal, not proof of the exact legal entity you will onboard with.

Investor protection

Unknown

Top-tier regulation helps on paper, but the canonical dataset still does not lock the exact compensation scheme or client-money safeguards for every onboarding entity.

Verification state

Verified

Verification state: brand-level regulator mapping is in place, but the exact contracting entity is still inferred rather than fully pinned in the canonical dataset.

High-risk warning

Broker-stated

The leverage ceiling is comparatively tighter, but CFDs and leveraged forex still carry real loss risk.

Safer alternative lens

If this profile feels too aggressive, compare brokers with cleaner tier-1 coverage and lower leverage ceilings before funding an account.

Evidence labels

How to read the evidence in Aquilla Nummus vs Fortrade

Comparison pages mix our own review work with broker-published facts and outside records. The labels make that visible instead of flattening everything into one fake confidence level.

Overall verdict and score differences

Verified

These come from our review methodology and the underlying hands-on review dataset used for scoring.

Spreads, minimum deposits, leverage, and platform lists

Broker-stated

These are usually published broker facts unless a review explicitly documents a direct test.

Regulation and entity background

Third-party

Those checks rely on regulator registers and other external records, not just broker marketing copy.

Cells the source reviews do not support cleanly

Unknown

If the underlying evidence is thin or conflicted, the safe answer is to keep the gap visible.

Verified

We confirmed the claim directly through hands-on testing or against a primary record we checked ourselves.

Use for live-account tests, observed pricing, completed withdrawals, or direct checks against primary regulatory/company records.

Broker-stated

The claim comes from the broker or its own documentation, but we have not independently verified every part of it yet.

Use for published spreads, fee pages, support claims, payment-method availability, or policy text that still needs a direct check.

Third-party

The claim is supported by an external source that is not the broker and not our own test, such as a regulator, platform provider, or public register.

Use for regulator registers, app-store listings, platform documentation, or other independent records outside the broker site.

Unknown

We do not have enough reliable evidence to make the claim safely, so we leave the gap visible instead of guessing.

Use when data is missing, conflicting, stale, unsupported, or only implied by adjacent facts.

Key Differences at a Glance

  • 📊

    Fortrade scores 7.5/10 overall vs 5.9/10 for Aquilla Nummus — a 1.6-point difference.

  • 💵

    Fortrade requires just $100 to start, while Aquilla Nummus needs $10000 — Fortrade is 100x more accessible.

  • 📈

    Fortrade offers 300+ instruments vs 150+ at Aquilla Nummus — a notable difference in market coverage.

  • 🖥️

    Aquilla Nummus runs on Advisory Service, Managed Account, while Fortrade uses Fortrade Platform, MT4, Fortrade Mobile — different ecosystems for different trading styles.

  • The biggest gap is in Platforms & Tools: Fortrade scores 7.5 vs 4.5 for Aquilla Nummus — a 3.0-point difference.

Our Verdict

Aquilla Nummus

Aquilla Nummus

Score: 5.9/10 · Wins 0 categories
  • You prefer Aquilla Nummus's trading environment overall
🏆 WINNER
Fortrade

Fortrade

Score: 7.5/10 · Wins 8 categories
  • You want lower spreads and trading fees
  • You're a beginner who values learning resources
  • You need advanced trading platforms and tools
  • Top-tier regulation and fund safety are your priority

Fortrade takes the lead with an overall score of 7.5/10 compared to 5.9/10, winning in 8 out of 8 scoring categories. Fortrade stands out for lower trading costs and better trading platforms, while Aquilla Nummus remains a solid alternative.

Broker recommendation block

If you only shortlist two names after this comparison, make it Fortrade first and Aquilla Nummus second

Fortrade is the stronger default pick on the numbers here, but Aquilla Nummus still makes sense if its edge lines up with how you actually trade.

Fortrade

🟢 Tier 1 Regulated

FCA · CySEC · ASIC

7.5

Fortrade wins this matchup on overall score, especially for lower trading costs and better trading platforms.

Overall score

7.5/10

Minimum deposit

$100

Aquilla Nummus

🟢 Tier 1 Regulated

CySEC

5.9

Aquilla Nummus is the fallback option here if you prefer its pricing, platform feel, or account terms after a live test.

Overall score

5.9/10

Minimum deposit

$10000

Detailed Verdict

After testing both brokers with real accounts, Fortrade comes out ahead with a 7.5/10 overall rating, winning 8 out of 8 categories. Its strongest area is Regulation & Trust where it scores 8.5/10. Fortrade holds Tier 1 regulation, meaning your funds benefit from top-level investor protection including segregated accounts and compensation schemes. Aquilla Nummus is not without merit — it scores 5.9/10 overall and excels in Regulation & Trust (6.5/10). For a complete breakdown, read our full Fortrade review and Aquilla Nummus review — both include account opening walkthroughs, platform screenshots, and withdrawal test results.

Score Breakdown

Aquilla Nummus
Fortrade
Trading Costs
5.5 7.0

Fortrade wins by 1.5 points

Platforms & Tools
4.5 7.5

Fortrade wins by 3.0 points

Regulation & Trust
6.5 8.5

Fortrade wins by 2.0 points

Education
5.0 7.5

Fortrade wins by 2.5 points

Customer Service
6.5 7.5

Fortrade wins by 1.0 points

Research & Analysis
6.0 7.0

Fortrade wins by 1.0 points

Deposit & Withdrawal
5.5 7.5

Fortrade wins by 2.0 points

Product Range
6.5 7.5

Fortrade wins by 1.0 points

Full Feature Comparison

Structured broker facts pulled from the shared broker dataset. In practice that usually means Verified scoring logic, Broker-stated commercial facts, and Third-party regulation checks — with Unknown left visible when the source reviews do not support a cleaner claim.
Feature
Overall Score
5.9/10
7.5/10
Min Deposit
Lower is better
$10000
$100
Max Leverage
1:5
1:30
Spreads From
Variable
0.8 pips
Platforms
Advisory Service, Managed Account
Fortrade Platform, MT4, Fortrade Mobile
Regulation
CySEC
FCA, CySEC, ASIC, IIROC
Founded
Older track record highlighted
2016
2013
Markets
150+
300+
Aquilla Nummus: 0 Fortrade: 1
💰

Fees & Costs

🏅 Section Winner: Fortrade (5.5 vs 7.0)

When it comes to trading costs, Fortrade has the edge with a score of 7/10 versus 5.5/10 for Aquilla Nummus. Aquilla Nummus offers spreads starting from Variable, while Fortrade starts from 0.8 pips. The minimum deposit at Aquilla Nummus is $10000, compared to $100 at Fortrade. Both brokers operate primarily on a spread-based pricing model, though actual costs vary by account type and instrument. For high-volume traders, even small spread differences add up significantly over time, making this an important category to weigh carefully.

Aquilla Nummus
5.5
Fortrade
7.0
Aquilla Nummus: 0 Fortrade: 2
🖥️

Trading Platforms

🏅 Section Winner: Fortrade (4.5 vs 7.5)

Fortrade scores 7.5/10 for platforms compared to 4.5/10 for Aquilla Nummus. Aquilla Nummus provides Advisory Service, Managed Account, while Fortrade offers Fortrade Platform, MT4, Fortrade Mobile. The choice of platform affects your charting, order execution speed, and available technical indicators. Traders who rely on MetaTrader's algorithmic trading capabilities should check which MT4/MT5 features each broker supports, including custom indicators and expert advisors.

Aquilla Nummus
4.5
Fortrade
7.5
Aquilla Nummus: 0 Fortrade: 3
🛡️

Regulation & Safety

🏅 Section Winner: Fortrade (6.5 vs 8.5)

Regulation is crucial for fund safety. Aquilla Nummus is regulated by CySEC (Tier 1), while Fortrade holds licenses from FCA, CySEC, ASIC, IIROC (Tier 1). Aquilla Nummus scores 6.5/10 and Fortrade scores 8.5/10 in this category. Aquilla Nummus shows 1 regulator in the shared broker dataset. Treat that as a brand-level trust signal, not proof of the exact legal entity you will onboard with. Fortrade shows 4 regulators in the shared broker dataset. Treat that as a brand-level trust signal, not proof of the exact legal entity you will onboard with. Tier 1 regulators like FCA, ASIC, and CySEC offer the strongest investor protection, but you should still verify the specific entity covering your jurisdiction before opening an account.

Aquilla Nummus
6.5
Fortrade
8.5
Aquilla Nummus: 0 Fortrade: 4
📚

Education & Research

🏅 Section Winner: Fortrade (5.0 vs 7.5)

For learning resources, Fortrade leads with 7.5/10 compared to 5/10. Quality education materials can shorten your learning curve significantly. Look for brokers offering structured courses, live webinars, and practice demo accounts. Aquilla Nummus and Fortrade both provide demo accounts for risk-free practice, but the depth of educational content varies. Beginners should prioritize this category when choosing between the two.

Aquilla Nummus
5.0
Fortrade
7.5
Aquilla Nummus: 0 Fortrade: 5
🎧

Customer Support

🏅 Section Winner: Fortrade (6.5 vs 7.5)

Aquilla Nummus offers Email, Phone and scores 6.5/10, while Fortrade provides 24/5 Live Chat, Email, Phone with a score of 7.5/10. Reliable support becomes critical during market volatility or when you encounter account issues. Look for brokers with 24/5 or 24/7 availability, multiple contact channels, and support in your preferred language.

Aquilla Nummus
6.5
Fortrade
7.5
Aquilla Nummus: 0 Fortrade: 6
💳

Deposit & Withdrawal

🏅 Section Winner: Fortrade (5.5 vs 7.5)

Aquilla Nummus scores 5.5/10 for deposits and withdrawals, while Fortrade scores 7.5/10. Aquilla Nummus accepts Bank Transfer, and Fortrade supports Bank Transfer, Credit Card, Debit Card, Skrill, Neteller, PayPal. Processing times, fees, and available currencies vary. Aquilla Nummus requires a minimum deposit of $10000 versus $100 for Fortrade. Always check withdrawal conditions and any potential fees before funding your account.

Aquilla Nummus
5.5
Fortrade
7.5

Which Broker Is Right for You?

Aquilla Nummus

Choose Aquilla Nummus if you...

  • You prefer Aquilla Nummus's trading environment overall
Visit Aquilla Nummus
Fortrade

Choose Fortrade if you...

  • You want lower spreads and trading fees
  • You're a beginner who values learning resources
  • You need advanced trading platforms and tools
  • Top-tier regulation and fund safety are your priority
Visit Fortrade

🗳️ Which Broker Do You Prefer?

Cast your vote — see what other traders think

Routing after Aquilla Nummus vs Fortrade

Compare pages should route readers back to evidence, up to best-of lists, and across to regulator entities when trust is the real blocker.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Aquilla Nummus better than Fortrade?
Fortrade scores higher overall (7.5/10 vs 5.9/10), winning 8 of 8 categories. However, Aquilla Nummus remains competitive. The best choice depends on what matters most to your trading style.
Which has lower fees, Aquilla Nummus or Fortrade?
Fortrade scores higher for trading costs. Aquilla Nummus offers spreads from Variable with a $10000 minimum deposit, while Fortrade starts from 0.8 pips with $100 minimum. Actual trading costs depend on your instrument, volume, and account type.
Is Aquilla Nummus safe to trade with?
Aquilla Nummus is regulated by CySEC and scores 6.5/10 for regulation. Fortrade is regulated by FCA, CySEC, ASIC, IIROC with a score of 8.5/10. Both hold recognized licenses, but verify the specific entity covering your region.
Which has better trading platforms, Aquilla Nummus or Fortrade?
Fortrade scores 7.5/10 for platforms. Aquilla Nummus offers Advisory Service, Managed Account, while Fortrade provides Fortrade Platform, MT4, Fortrade Mobile. Your ideal platform depends on whether you prefer proprietary tools, MetaTrader, or third-party solutions.
What's the minimum deposit for Aquilla Nummus vs Fortrade?
Aquilla Nummus requires a minimum deposit of $10000, while Fortrade requires $100. Fortrade has the lower entry barrier, making it more accessible for beginners or those testing with smaller amounts.

Ready to Start Trading?

Open a free account with either broker and start trading today.

← Back to Compare Tool