3D Global Financial Services

3D Global Financial Services

🟢 Tier 1 Regulated
5.8
/ 10
vs
Interactive Brokers

Interactive Brokers

🟢 Tier 1 Regulated
9.2
/ 10

3D Global Financial Services vs Interactive Brokers

A detailed side-by-side comparison based on our hands-on testing across 8 scoring categories.

3D Global Financial Services and Interactive Brokers are both popular choices for forex and CFD traders, but they cater to different needs and experience levels. 3D Global Financial Services, founded in 2012 and headquartered in Larnaca, Cyprus, is regulated by CySEC and offers spreads starting from Variable with a minimum deposit of $10000. Interactive Brokers, established in 1978 in Greenwich, USA, holds licenses from SEC, FCA, ASIC, MAS, IIROC with spreads from 0.1 pips and a $0 minimum deposit. In our hands-on testing across 8 scoring categories, Interactive Brokers scored 9.2/10 overall compared to 3D Global Financial Services's 5.8/10, making it the stronger pick for most traders. That said, 3D Global Financial Services holds its own with overall value, so your ideal broker depends on what you prioritize in a trading partner.

Key Differences at a Glance

  • 📊

    Interactive Brokers scores 9.2/10 overall vs 5.8/10 for 3D Global Financial Services — a 3.4-point difference.

  • 💵

    Interactive Brokers requires just $0 to start, while 3D Global Financial Services needs $10000 — Interactive Brokers is 10000x more accessible.

  • 📈

    Interactive Brokers offers 1,000,000+ instruments vs 50+ at 3D Global Financial Services — a massive gap in market coverage.

  • 🖥️

    3D Global Financial Services runs on Online Portal, Advisory Service, while Interactive Brokers uses TWS, IBKR Mobile, IBKR GlobalTrader — different ecosystems for different trading styles.

  • The biggest gap is in Trading Costs: Interactive Brokers scores 9.5 vs 5.0 for 3D Global Financial Services — a 4.5-point difference.

Our Verdict

3D Global Financial Services

3D Global Financial Services

Score: 5.8/10 · Wins 0 categories
  • You prefer 3D Global Financial Services's trading environment overall
🏆 WINNER
Interactive Brokers

Interactive Brokers

Score: 9.2/10 · Wins 8 categories
  • You want lower spreads and trading fees
  • You're a beginner who values learning resources
  • You need advanced trading platforms and tools
  • Top-tier regulation and fund safety are your priority

Interactive Brokers takes the lead with an overall score of 9.2/10 compared to 5.8/10, winning in 8 out of 8 scoring categories. Interactive Brokers stands out for lower trading costs and better trading platforms, while 3D Global Financial Services remains a solid alternative.

Detailed Verdict

After testing both brokers with real accounts, Interactive Brokers comes out ahead with a 9.2/10 overall rating, winning 8 out of 8 categories. Its strongest area is Regulation & Trust where it scores 10.0/10. Interactive Brokers holds Tier 1 regulation, meaning your funds benefit from top-level investor protection including segregated accounts and compensation schemes. 3D Global Financial Services is not without merit — it scores 5.8/10 overall and excels in Regulation & Trust (6.5/10). For a complete breakdown, read our full Interactive Brokers review and 3D Global Financial Services review — both include account opening walkthroughs, platform screenshots, and withdrawal test results.

Score Breakdown

3D Global Financial Services
Interactive Brokers
Trading Costs
5.0 9.5

Interactive Brokers wins by 4.5 points

Platforms & Tools
4.5 8.5

Interactive Brokers wins by 4.0 points

Regulation & Trust
6.5 10.0

Interactive Brokers wins by 3.5 points

Education
5.5 8.0

Interactive Brokers wins by 2.5 points

Customer Service
6.5 7.5

Interactive Brokers wins by 1.0 points

Research & Analysis
5.5 9.5

Interactive Brokers wins by 4.0 points

Deposit & Withdrawal
5.5 8.0

Interactive Brokers wins by 2.5 points

Product Range
5.5 10.0

Interactive Brokers wins by 4.5 points

Full Feature Comparison

Structured broker facts pulled from the shared broker dataset.
Feature
Overall Score
5.8/10
9.2/10
Min Deposit
Lower is better
$10000
$0
Max Leverage
1:5
1:50
Spreads From
Variable
0.1 pips
Platforms
Online Portal, Advisory Service
TWS, IBKR Mobile, IBKR GlobalTrader
Regulation
CySEC
SEC, FCA, ASIC, MAS, IIROC
Founded
Older track record highlighted
2012
1978
Markets
50+
1,000,000+
3D Global Financial Services: 0 Interactive Brokers: 1
💰

Fees & Costs

🏅 Section Winner: Interactive Brokers (5.0 vs 9.5)

When it comes to trading costs, Interactive Brokers has the edge with a score of 9.5/10 versus 5/10 for 3D Global Financial Services. 3D Global Financial Services offers spreads starting from Variable, while Interactive Brokers starts from 0.1 pips. The minimum deposit at 3D Global Financial Services is $10000, compared to $0 at Interactive Brokers. Both brokers operate primarily on a spread-based pricing model, though actual costs vary by account type and instrument. For high-volume traders, even small spread differences add up significantly over time, making this an important category to weigh carefully.

3D Global Financial Services
5.0
Interactive Brokers
9.5
3D Global Financial Services: 0 Interactive Brokers: 2
🖥️

Trading Platforms

🏅 Section Winner: Interactive Brokers (4.5 vs 8.5)

Interactive Brokers scores 8.5/10 for platforms compared to 4.5/10 for 3D Global Financial Services. 3D Global Financial Services provides Online Portal, Advisory Service, while Interactive Brokers offers TWS, IBKR Mobile, IBKR GlobalTrader. The choice of platform affects your charting, order execution speed, and available technical indicators. Traders who rely on MetaTrader's algorithmic trading capabilities should check which MT4/MT5 features each broker supports, including custom indicators and expert advisors.

3D Global Financial Services
4.5
Interactive Brokers
8.5
3D Global Financial Services: 0 Interactive Brokers: 3
🛡️

Regulation & Safety

🏅 Section Winner: Interactive Brokers (6.5 vs 10.0)

Regulation is crucial for fund safety. 3D Global Financial Services is regulated by CySEC (Tier 1), while Interactive Brokers holds licenses from SEC, FCA, ASIC, MAS, IIROC (Tier 1). 3D Global Financial Services scores 6.5/10 and Interactive Brokers scores 10/10 in this category. Tier 1 regulators like FCA, ASIC, and CySEC offer the strongest investor protection, including segregated client funds and compensation schemes. Always verify your broker's specific license for your jurisdiction before opening an account.

3D Global Financial Services
6.5
Interactive Brokers
10.0
3D Global Financial Services: 0 Interactive Brokers: 4
📚

Education & Research

🏅 Section Winner: Interactive Brokers (5.5 vs 8.0)

For learning resources, Interactive Brokers leads with 8/10 compared to 5.5/10. Quality education materials can shorten your learning curve significantly. Look for brokers offering structured courses, live webinars, and practice demo accounts. 3D Global Financial Services and Interactive Brokers both provide demo accounts for risk-free practice, but the depth of educational content varies. Beginners should prioritize this category when choosing between the two.

3D Global Financial Services
5.5
Interactive Brokers
8.0
3D Global Financial Services: 0 Interactive Brokers: 5
🎧

Customer Support

🏅 Section Winner: Interactive Brokers (6.5 vs 7.5)

3D Global Financial Services offers Email, Phone, In-person and scores 6.5/10, while Interactive Brokers provides 24/6 Live Chat, Email, Phone with a score of 7.5/10. Reliable support becomes critical during market volatility or when you encounter account issues. Look for brokers with 24/5 or 24/7 availability, multiple contact channels, and support in your preferred language.

3D Global Financial Services
6.5
Interactive Brokers
7.5
3D Global Financial Services: 0 Interactive Brokers: 6
💳

Deposit & Withdrawal

🏅 Section Winner: Interactive Brokers (5.5 vs 8.0)

3D Global Financial Services scores 5.5/10 for deposits and withdrawals, while Interactive Brokers scores 8/10. 3D Global Financial Services accepts Bank Transfer, and Interactive Brokers supports Bank Transfer, ACH. Processing times, fees, and available currencies vary. 3D Global Financial Services requires a minimum deposit of $10000 versus $0 for Interactive Brokers. Always check withdrawal conditions and any potential fees before funding your account.

3D Global Financial Services
5.5
Interactive Brokers
8.0

Which Broker Is Right for You?

3D Global Financial Services

Choose 3D Global Financial Services if you...

  • You prefer 3D Global Financial Services's trading environment overall
Visit 3D Global Financial Services
Interactive Brokers

Choose Interactive Brokers if you...

  • You want lower spreads and trading fees
  • You're a beginner who values learning resources
  • You need advanced trading platforms and tools
  • Top-tier regulation and fund safety are your priority
Visit Interactive Brokers

🗳️ Which Broker Do You Prefer?

Cast your vote — see what other traders think

Frequently Asked Questions

Is 3D Global Financial Services better than Interactive Brokers?

Interactive Brokers scores higher overall (9.2/10 vs 5.8/10), winning 8 of 8 categories. However, 3D Global Financial Services remains competitive. The best choice depends on what matters most to your trading style.

Which has lower fees, 3D Global Financial Services or Interactive Brokers?

Interactive Brokers scores higher for trading costs. 3D Global Financial Services offers spreads from Variable with a $10000 minimum deposit, while Interactive Brokers starts from 0.1 pips with $0 minimum. Actual trading costs depend on your instrument, volume, and account type.

Is 3D Global Financial Services safe to trade with?

3D Global Financial Services is regulated by CySEC and scores 6.5/10 for regulation. Interactive Brokers is regulated by SEC, FCA, ASIC, MAS, IIROC with a score of 10/10. Both hold recognized licenses, but verify the specific entity covering your region.

Which has better trading platforms, 3D Global Financial Services or Interactive Brokers?

Interactive Brokers scores 8.5/10 for platforms. 3D Global Financial Services offers Online Portal, Advisory Service, while Interactive Brokers provides TWS, IBKR Mobile, IBKR GlobalTrader. Your ideal platform depends on whether you prefer proprietary tools, MetaTrader, or third-party solutions.

What's the minimum deposit for 3D Global Financial Services vs Interactive Brokers?

3D Global Financial Services requires a minimum deposit of $10000, while Interactive Brokers requires $0. Interactive Brokers has the lower entry barrier, making it more accessible for beginners or those testing with smaller amounts.

← Back to Compare Tool