HFM

HFM

🟢 Tier 1 Regulated
8.0
/ 10
vs
FBS

FBS

🟢 Tier 1 Regulated
7.2
/ 10

HFM vs FBS

A detailed side-by-side comparison based on our hands-on testing across 8 scoring categories.

HFM and FBS are both popular choices for forex and CFD traders, but they cater to different needs and experience levels. HFM, founded in 2010 and headquartered in Limassol, Cyprus, is regulated by CySEC, FCA, FSCA, FSA and offers spreads starting from 0.0 pips with a minimum deposit of $5. FBS, established in 2009 in Belize City, Belize, holds licenses from IFSC, CySEC with spreads from 0.7 pips and a $5 minimum deposit. In our hands-on testing across 8 scoring categories, HFM scored 8/10 overall compared to FBS's 7.2/10, making it the stronger pick for most traders. That said, FBS holds its own with overall value, so your ideal broker depends on what you prioritize in a trading partner.

Key Differences at a Glance

  • 📊

    HFM scores 8/10 overall vs 7.2/10 for FBS — a 0.8-point difference.

  • 📈

    HFM offers 1,200+ instruments vs 250+ at FBS — a massive gap in market coverage.

  • 🖥️

    HFM runs on MT4, MT5, HFM App, while FBS uses MT4, MT5, FBS Trader App — different ecosystems for different trading styles.

  • The biggest gap is in Regulation & Trust: HFM scores 9.0 vs 6.5 for FBS — a 2.5-point difference.

Our Verdict

🏆 WINNER
HFM

HFM

Score: 8.0/10 · Wins 6 categories
  • You want lower spreads and trading fees
  • You need advanced trading platforms and tools
  • Top-tier regulation and fund safety are your priority
  • Responsive customer support matters to you
FBS

FBS

Score: 7.2/10 · Wins 0 categories
  • You prefer FBS's trading environment overall

HFM takes the lead with an overall score of 8/10 compared to 7.2/10, winning in 6 out of 8 scoring categories. HFM stands out for lower trading costs and better trading platforms, while FBS remains a solid alternative.

Detailed Verdict

After testing both brokers with real accounts, HFM comes out ahead with a 8/10 overall rating, winning 6 out of 8 categories. Its strongest area is Regulation & Trust where it scores 9.0/10. HFM holds Tier 1 regulation, meaning your funds benefit from top-level investor protection including segregated accounts and compensation schemes. FBS is not without merit — it scores 7.2/10 overall and excels in Deposit & Withdrawal (8.0/10). For a complete breakdown, read our full HFM review and FBS review — both include account opening walkthroughs, platform screenshots, and withdrawal test results.

Score Breakdown

HFM
FBS
Trading Costs
8.0 7.0

HFM wins by 1.0 points

Platforms & Tools
7.5 7.0

HFM wins by 0.5 points

Regulation & Trust
9.0 6.5

HFM wins by 2.5 points

Education
7.5 7.5
Customer Service
7.5 7.0

HFM wins by 0.5 points

Research & Analysis
7.0 6.5

HFM wins by 0.5 points

Deposit & Withdrawal
8.0 8.0
Product Range
7.5 6.5

HFM wins by 1.0 points

Full Feature Comparison

Structured broker facts pulled from the shared broker dataset.
Feature
Overall Score
8.0/10
7.2/10
Min Deposit
Lower is better
$5
$5
Max Leverage
1:2000
1:3000
Spreads From
0.0 pips
0.7 pips
Platforms
MT4, MT5, HFM App
MT4, MT5, FBS Trader App
Regulation
CySEC, FCA, FSCA, FSA
IFSC, CySEC
Founded
Older track record highlighted
2010
2009
Markets
1,200+
250+
HFM: 1 FBS: 0
💰

Fees & Costs

🏅 Section Winner: HFM (8.0 vs 7.0)

When it comes to trading costs, HFM has the edge with a score of 8/10 versus 7/10 for FBS. HFM offers spreads starting from 0.0 pips, while FBS starts from 0.7 pips. The minimum deposit at HFM is $5, compared to $5 at FBS. Both brokers operate primarily on a spread-based pricing model, though actual costs vary by account type and instrument. For high-volume traders, even small spread differences add up significantly over time, making this an important category to weigh carefully.

HFM
8.0
FBS
7.0
HFM: 2 FBS: 0
🖥️

Trading Platforms

🏅 Section Winner: HFM (7.5 vs 7.0)

HFM scores 7.5/10 for platforms compared to 7/10 for FBS. HFM provides MT4, MT5, HFM App, while FBS offers MT4, MT5, FBS Trader App. The choice of platform affects your charting, order execution speed, and available technical indicators. Traders who rely on MetaTrader's algorithmic trading capabilities should check which MT4/MT5 features each broker supports, including custom indicators and expert advisors.

HFM
7.5
FBS
7.0
HFM: 3 FBS: 0
🛡️

Regulation & Safety

🏅 Section Winner: HFM (9.0 vs 6.5)

Regulation is crucial for fund safety. HFM is regulated by CySEC, FCA, FSCA, FSA (Tier 1), while FBS holds licenses from IFSC, CySEC (Tier 1). HFM scores 9/10 and FBS scores 6.5/10 in this category. Tier 1 regulators like FCA, ASIC, and CySEC offer the strongest investor protection, including segregated client funds and compensation schemes. Always verify your broker's specific license for your jurisdiction before opening an account.

HFM
9.0
FBS
6.5
HFM: 3 FBS: 0
📚

Education & Research

For learning resources, HFM leads with 7.5/10 compared to 7.5/10. Quality education materials can shorten your learning curve significantly. Look for brokers offering structured courses, live webinars, and practice demo accounts. HFM and FBS both provide demo accounts for risk-free practice, but the depth of educational content varies. Beginners should prioritize this category when choosing between the two.

HFM
7.5
FBS
7.5
HFM: 4 FBS: 0
🎧

Customer Support

🏅 Section Winner: HFM (7.5 vs 7.0)

HFM offers 24/5 Live Chat, Email, Phone and scores 7.5/10, while FBS provides 24/7 Live Chat, Email, Phone with a score of 7/10. Reliable support becomes critical during market volatility or when you encounter account issues. Look for brokers with 24/5 or 24/7 availability, multiple contact channels, and support in your preferred language.

HFM
7.5
FBS
7.0
HFM: 4 FBS: 0
💳

Deposit & Withdrawal

HFM scores 8/10 for deposits and withdrawals, while FBS scores 8/10. HFM accepts Bank Transfer, Credit Card, Skrill, Neteller, Bitcoin, and FBS supports Bank Transfer, Credit Card, Skrill, Neteller, Sticpay. Processing times, fees, and available currencies vary. HFM requires a minimum deposit of $5 versus $5 for FBS. Always check withdrawal conditions and any potential fees before funding your account.

HFM
8.0
FBS
8.0

Which Broker Is Right for You?

HFM

Choose HFM if you...

  • You want lower spreads and trading fees
  • You need advanced trading platforms and tools
  • Top-tier regulation and fund safety are your priority
  • Responsive customer support matters to you
Visit HFM
FBS

Choose FBS if you...

  • You prefer FBS's trading environment overall
Visit FBS

🗳️ Which Broker Do You Prefer?

Cast your vote — see what other traders think

Frequently Asked Questions

Is HFM better than FBS?

HFM scores higher overall (8/10 vs 7.2/10), winning 6 of 8 categories. However, FBS remains competitive. The best choice depends on what matters most to your trading style.

Which has lower fees, HFM or FBS?

HFM scores higher for trading costs. HFM offers spreads from 0.0 pips with a $5 minimum deposit, while FBS starts from 0.7 pips with $5 minimum. Actual trading costs depend on your instrument, volume, and account type.

Is HFM safe to trade with?

HFM is regulated by CySEC, FCA, FSCA, FSA and scores 9/10 for regulation. FBS is regulated by IFSC, CySEC with a score of 6.5/10. Both hold recognized licenses, but verify the specific entity covering your region.

Which has better trading platforms, HFM or FBS?

HFM scores 7.5/10 for platforms. HFM offers MT4, MT5, HFM App, while FBS provides MT4, MT5, FBS Trader App. Your ideal platform depends on whether you prefer proprietary tools, MetaTrader, or third-party solutions.

What's the minimum deposit for HFM vs FBS?

HFM requires a minimum deposit of $5, while FBS requires $5. FBS has the lower entry barrier, making it more accessible for beginners or those testing with smaller amounts.

Ready to Start Trading?

Open a free account with either broker and start trading today.

← Back to Compare Tool