FP Markets
Trading 212
FP Markets vs Trading 212
A detailed side-by-side comparison based on our hands-on testing across 8 scoring categories.
FP Markets and Trading 212 are both popular choices for forex and CFD traders, but they cater to different needs and experience levels. FP Markets, founded in 2005 and headquartered in Sydney, Australia, is regulated by ASIC, CySEC and offers spreads starting from 0.0 pips with a minimum deposit of $100. Trading 212, established in 2004 in London, UK, holds licenses from FCA, CySEC with spreads from 0.5 pips and a $1 minimum deposit. In our hands-on testing across 8 scoring categories, Trading 212 scored 8.3/10 overall compared to FP Markets's 8.2/10, making it the stronger pick for most traders. That said, FP Markets holds its own with better customer support, so your ideal broker depends on what you prioritize in a trading partner.
Key Differences at a Glance
- 📊
Trading 212 scores 8.3/10 overall vs 8.2/10 for FP Markets — a 0.1-point difference.
- 💵
Trading 212 requires just $1 to start, while FP Markets needs $100 — Trading 212 is 100x more accessible.
- 📈
Trading 212 offers 12,000+ instruments vs 10,000+ at FP Markets — a notable difference in market coverage.
- 🖥️
FP Markets runs on MT4, MT5, cTrader, IRESS, while Trading 212 uses Trading 212 App — different ecosystems for different trading styles.
- ⚡
The biggest gap is in Deposit & Withdrawal: Trading 212 scores 9.0 vs 8.0 for FP Markets — a 1.0-point difference.
Our Verdict
FP Markets
Score: 8.2/10 · Wins 1 categories- Responsive customer support matters to you
- You prefer FP Markets's trading environment overall
Trading 212
Score: 8.3/10 · Wins 4 categories- You want lower spreads and trading fees
- You're a beginner who values learning resources
- You want access to a wider range of instruments
- Fast and flexible deposits & withdrawals are important
Trading 212 takes the lead with an overall score of 8.3/10 compared to 8.2/10, winning in 4 out of 8 scoring categories. Trading 212 stands out for lower trading costs and superior education resources, while FP Markets fights back with better customer support.
Detailed Verdict
After testing both brokers with real accounts, Trading 212 comes out ahead with a 8.3/10 overall rating, winning 4 out of 8 categories. Its strongest area is Trading Costs where it scores 9.0/10. Trading 212 holds Tier 1 regulation, meaning your funds benefit from top-level investor protection including segregated accounts and compensation schemes. FP Markets is not without merit — it scores 8.2/10 overall and excels in Trading Costs (8.5/10), winning 1 category. Traders who value better customer support may find FP Markets the better fit. For a complete breakdown, read our full Trading 212 review and FP Markets review — both include account opening walkthroughs, platform screenshots, and withdrawal test results.
Score Breakdown
Trading 212 wins by 0.5 points
Trading 212 wins by 0.5 points
FP Markets wins by 0.5 points
Trading 212 wins by 1.0 points
Trading 212 wins by 0.5 points
Full Feature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 8.2/10 | 8.3/10 ✓ |
| Min Deposit Lower is better | $100 | $1 ✓ |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 | 1:30 |
| Spreads From | 0.0 pips | 0.5 pips |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, cTrader, IRESS | Trading 212 App |
| Regulation | ASIC, CySEC | FCA, CySEC |
| Founded Older track record highlighted | 2005 | 2004 ✓ |
| Markets | 10,000+ | 12,000+ ✓ |
Fees & Costs
When it comes to trading costs, Trading 212 has the edge with a score of 9/10 versus 8.5/10 for FP Markets. FP Markets offers spreads starting from 0.0 pips, while Trading 212 starts from 0.5 pips. The minimum deposit at FP Markets is $100, compared to $1 at Trading 212. Both brokers operate primarily on a spread-based pricing model, though actual costs vary by account type and instrument. For high-volume traders, even small spread differences add up significantly over time, making this an important category to weigh carefully.
Trading Platforms
FP Markets scores 8.5/10 for platforms compared to 8.5/10 for Trading 212. FP Markets provides MT4, MT5, cTrader, IRESS, while Trading 212 offers Trading 212 App. The choice of platform affects your charting, order execution speed, and available technical indicators. Traders who rely on MetaTrader's algorithmic trading capabilities should check which MT4/MT5 features each broker supports, including custom indicators and expert advisors.
Regulation & Safety
Regulation is crucial for fund safety. FP Markets is regulated by ASIC, CySEC (Tier 1), while Trading 212 holds licenses from FCA, CySEC (Tier 1). FP Markets scores 8.5/10 and Trading 212 scores 8.5/10 in this category. Tier 1 regulators like FCA, ASIC, and CySEC offer the strongest investor protection, including segregated client funds and compensation schemes. Always verify your broker's specific license for your jurisdiction before opening an account.
Education & Research
For learning resources, Trading 212 leads with 7.5/10 compared to 7/10. Quality education materials can shorten your learning curve significantly. Look for brokers offering structured courses, live webinars, and practice demo accounts. FP Markets and Trading 212 both provide demo accounts for risk-free practice, but the depth of educational content varies. Beginners should prioritize this category when choosing between the two.
Customer Support
FP Markets offers 24/7 Live Chat, Email, Phone and scores 8/10, while Trading 212 provides 24/7 Live Chat, Email with a score of 7.5/10. Reliable support becomes critical during market volatility or when you encounter account issues. Look for brokers with 24/5 or 24/7 availability, multiple contact channels, and support in your preferred language.
Deposit & Withdrawal
FP Markets scores 8/10 for deposits and withdrawals, while Trading 212 scores 9/10. FP Markets accepts Bank Transfer, Credit Card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller, and Trading 212 supports Bank Transfer, Credit Card, Google Pay, Apple Pay. Processing times, fees, and available currencies vary. FP Markets requires a minimum deposit of $100 versus $1 for Trading 212. Always check withdrawal conditions and any potential fees before funding your account.
Which Broker Is Right for You?
Choose FP Markets if you...
- Responsive customer support matters to you
- You prefer FP Markets's trading environment overall
Choose Trading 212 if you...
- You want lower spreads and trading fees
- You're a beginner who values learning resources
- You want access to a wider range of instruments
- Fast and flexible deposits & withdrawals are important
🗳️ Which Broker Do You Prefer?
Cast your vote — see what other traders think
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FP Markets better than Trading 212?
Trading 212 scores higher overall (8.3/10 vs 8.2/10), winning 4 of 8 categories. However, FP Markets is stronger in better customer support. The best choice depends on what matters most to your trading style.
Which has lower fees, FP Markets or Trading 212?
Trading 212 scores higher for trading costs. FP Markets offers spreads from 0.0 pips with a $100 minimum deposit, while Trading 212 starts from 0.5 pips with $1 minimum. Actual trading costs depend on your instrument, volume, and account type.
Is FP Markets safe to trade with?
FP Markets is regulated by ASIC, CySEC and scores 8.5/10 for regulation. Trading 212 is regulated by FCA, CySEC with a score of 8.5/10. Both hold recognized licenses, but verify the specific entity covering your region.
Which has better trading platforms, FP Markets or Trading 212?
FP Markets scores 8.5/10 for platforms. FP Markets offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, IRESS, while Trading 212 provides Trading 212 App. Your ideal platform depends on whether you prefer proprietary tools, MetaTrader, or third-party solutions.
What's the minimum deposit for FP Markets vs Trading 212?
FP Markets requires a minimum deposit of $100, while Trading 212 requires $1. Trading 212 has the lower entry barrier, making it more accessible for beginners or those testing with smaller amounts.
Ready to Start Trading?
Open a free account with either broker and start trading today.