FBS vs Orbex

• 📊

  FBS scores 7.2/10 overall vs 7/10 for Orbex — a 0.2-point difference.

• 💵

  FBS requires just $5 to start, while Orbex needs $200 — FBS is 40x more accessible.

• 📈

  Orbex offers 300+ instruments vs 250+ at FBS — a notable difference in market coverage.

• 🖥️

  FBS runs on MT4, MT5, FBS Trader App, while Orbex uses MT4 — different ecosystems for different trading styles.

• ⚡

  The biggest gap is in Regulation & Trust: Orbex scores 7.5 vs 6.5 for FBS — a 1.0-point difference.

After testing both brokers with real accounts, FBS comes out ahead with a 7.2/10 overall rating, winning 3 out of 8 categories. Its strongest area is Deposit & Withdrawal where it scores 8.0/10. FBS holds Tier 1 regulation, meaning your funds benefit from top-level investor protection including segregated accounts and compensation schemes. Orbex is not without merit — it scores 7/10 overall and excels in Trading Costs (7.5/10), winning 3 categories. Traders who value lower trading costs or stronger regulation may find Orbex the better fit. For a complete breakdown, read our full FBS review and Orbex review — both include account opening walkthroughs, platform screenshots, and withdrawal test results.

Read FBS Review → Read Orbex Review →

When it comes to trading costs, Orbex has the edge with a score of 7.5/10 versus 7/10 for FBS. FBS offers spreads starting from 0.7 pips, while Orbex starts from 0.0 pips. The minimum deposit at FBS is $5, compared to $200 at Orbex. Both brokers operate primarily on a spread-based pricing model, though actual costs vary by account type and instrument. For high-volume traders, even small spread differences add up significantly over time, making this an important category to weigh carefully.

FBS scores 7/10 for platforms compared to 6.5/10 for Orbex. FBS provides MT4, MT5, FBS Trader App, while Orbex offers MT4. The choice of platform affects your charting, order execution speed, and available technical indicators. Traders who rely on MetaTrader's algorithmic trading capabilities should check which MT4/MT5 features each broker supports, including custom indicators and expert advisors.

Regulation is crucial for fund safety. FBS is regulated by IFSC, CySEC (Tier 1), while Orbex holds licenses from CySEC (Tier 1). FBS scores 6.5/10 and Orbex scores 7.5/10 in this category. Tier 1 regulators like FCA, ASIC, and CySEC offer the strongest investor protection, including segregated client funds and compensation schemes. Always verify your broker's specific license for your jurisdiction before opening an account.

For learning resources, FBS leads with 7.5/10 compared to 7/10. Quality education materials can shorten your learning curve significantly. Look for brokers offering structured courses, live webinars, and practice demo accounts. FBS and Orbex both provide demo accounts for risk-free practice, but the depth of educational content varies. Beginners should prioritize this category when choosing between the two.

FBS offers 24/7 Live Chat, Email, Phone and scores 7/10, while Orbex provides 24/5 Live Chat, Email, Phone with a score of 7/10. Reliable support becomes critical during market volatility or when you encounter account issues. Look for brokers with 24/5 or 24/7 availability, multiple contact channels, and support in your preferred language.

FBS scores 8/10 for deposits and withdrawals, while Orbex scores 7/10. FBS accepts Bank Transfer, Credit Card, Skrill, Neteller, Sticpay, and Orbex supports Bank Transfer, Credit Card, Skrill, Neteller. Processing times, fees, and available currencies vary. FBS requires a minimum deposit of $5 versus $200 for Orbex. Always check withdrawal conditions and any potential fees before funding your account.