FBS vs IC Markets

• 📊

  IC Markets scores 8.8/10 overall vs 7.2/10 for FBS — a 1.6-point difference.

• 💵

  FBS requires just $5 to start, while IC Markets needs $200 — FBS is 40x more accessible.

• 📈

  IC Markets offers 2,200+ instruments vs 250+ at FBS — a massive gap in market coverage.

• 🖥️

  FBS runs on MT4, MT5, FBS Trader App, while IC Markets uses MT4, MT5, cTrader — different ecosystems for different trading styles.

• ⚡

  The biggest gap is in Trading Costs: IC Markets scores 9.5 vs 7.0 for FBS — a 2.5-point difference.

After testing both brokers with real accounts, IC Markets comes out ahead with a 8.8/10 overall rating, winning 7 out of 8 categories. Its strongest area is Trading Costs where it scores 9.5/10. IC Markets holds Tier 1 regulation, meaning your funds benefit from top-level investor protection including segregated accounts and compensation schemes. FBS is not without merit — it scores 7.2/10 overall and excels in Deposit & Withdrawal (8.0/10), winning 1 category. Traders who value superior education resources may find FBS the better fit. For a complete breakdown, read our full IC Markets review and FBS review — both include account opening walkthroughs, platform screenshots, and withdrawal test results.

Read IC Markets Review → Read FBS Review →

When it comes to trading costs, IC Markets has the edge with a score of 9.5/10 versus 7/10 for FBS. FBS offers spreads starting from 0.7 pips, while IC Markets starts from 0.0 pips. The minimum deposit at FBS is $5, compared to $200 at IC Markets. Both brokers operate primarily on a spread-based pricing model, though actual costs vary by account type and instrument. For high-volume traders, even small spread differences add up significantly over time, making this an important category to weigh carefully.

IC Markets scores 9/10 for platforms compared to 7/10 for FBS. FBS provides MT4, MT5, FBS Trader App, while IC Markets offers MT4, MT5, cTrader. The choice of platform affects your charting, order execution speed, and available technical indicators. Traders who rely on MetaTrader's algorithmic trading capabilities should check which MT4/MT5 features each broker supports, including custom indicators and expert advisors.

Regulation is crucial for fund safety. FBS is regulated by IFSC, CySEC (Tier 1), while IC Markets holds licenses from ASIC, CySEC, FSA (Tier 1). FBS scores 6.5/10 and IC Markets scores 9/10 in this category. Tier 1 regulators like FCA, ASIC, and CySEC offer the strongest investor protection, including segregated client funds and compensation schemes. Always verify your broker's specific license for your jurisdiction before opening an account.

For learning resources, FBS leads with 7.5/10 compared to 7/10. Quality education materials can shorten your learning curve significantly. Look for brokers offering structured courses, live webinars, and practice demo accounts. FBS and IC Markets both provide demo accounts for risk-free practice, but the depth of educational content varies. Beginners should prioritize this category when choosing between the two.

FBS offers 24/7 Live Chat, Email, Phone and scores 7/10, while IC Markets provides 24/7 Live Chat, Email, Phone with a score of 8/10. Reliable support becomes critical during market volatility or when you encounter account issues. Look for brokers with 24/5 or 24/7 availability, multiple contact channels, and support in your preferred language.

FBS scores 8/10 for deposits and withdrawals, while IC Markets scores 8.5/10. FBS accepts Bank Transfer, Credit Card, Skrill, Neteller, Sticpay, and IC Markets supports Bank Transfer, Credit Card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller, UnionPay. Processing times, fees, and available currencies vary. FBS requires a minimum deposit of $5 versus $200 for IC Markets. Always check withdrawal conditions and any potential fees before funding your account.